In a 7-0 decision announced today, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that a legal dispute between a Boardman family and the Ohio Edison electric company over the proximity of two structures on the couple’s property to the company’s overhead power lines must be resolved through the local courts, rather than through a complaint proceeding before the state public utilities commission.
Attorney Paul F. Adamson

Categories
-
Recent Posts
- Former Public Safety Department Counsel Suspended
- Township Officer Promoted to Chief of Police Not Entitled to Reinstatement to Former Position After Firing as Chief
- Supreme Court Affirms Local Ruling Voiding Election Result in 2011 Stark County Tax Levy
- Law and Leadership Institute to Graduate First Class in June 2012
- Court Denies Newspaper’s Request for Names, Identifying Information of Police Officers Wounded in Gang Shootout
- Grandson Visits Site Where Grandfather Died in Blast
- Each Party Seeking to Modify or Reverse an Administrative Agency Ruling Must File Separate Appeal With Reviewing Court
- Penalty for Out-of-State Sex Offender’s Failure to Register in Ohio Based on ‘Substantially Equivalent’ Ohio Offense
- Chief Justice O’Connor Speaks at OSBA Convention
- Sentence That Omits Mandatory License Suspension Ruled Void, Resentencing Limited to Imposing Required Suspension
Tags
akron attorney akron ohio akron police akron police department anonymous tips bankruptcy bankruptcy car chase chief of police cleveland news concessions county deputies coventry township crime law deputies drive thru enforcement police finance co fraternal order of police fri fri dec fugitive furloughs gilbride gus hall home invasion human interest interest law latest local news law enforcement law enforcement organizations law lawyers mdash news briefs news feed ohio summit police associations police detectives police law police police summit county ohio summit county sheriff twinsburg ohio UTC war conflict wkyc tv
Similar Posts
- Court Partially Affirms, Partially Reverses PUCO Order Approving AEP Power Generation Rates for 2009-11
- Court Affirms PUCO Order Allowing AEP to Recoup Revenue Lost Due to Improved Efficiency, Peak Demand Reduction
- Court Affirms PUCO Order Withholding Approval to Sell Power Plants, Denying Rate Add-On to Cover Plant Costs
- Court Upholds PUCO Order Authorizing Columbia Gas to Repair Customer-Owned Service Lines
- Court Affirms PUCO’s Reductions In Utility’s Claimed Storm Recovery Costs
