The Supreme Court of Ohio held today that a provision in the state’s disorderly conduct statute, R.C. 2917.11(A)(2), that prohibits “recklessly causing inconvenience, annoyance or alarm to another by … making excessive noise” provides sufficient notice for a person of ordinary intelligence to understand what the law requires, and therefore is not unconstitutionally vague.
Attorney Paul F. Adamson
Categories
-
Recent Posts
- Former Public Safety Department Counsel Suspended
- Township Officer Promoted to Chief of Police Not Entitled to Reinstatement to Former Position After Firing as Chief
- Supreme Court Affirms Local Ruling Voiding Election Result in 2011 Stark County Tax Levy
- Law and Leadership Institute to Graduate First Class in June 2012
- Court Denies Newspaper’s Request for Names, Identifying Information of Police Officers Wounded in Gang Shootout
- Grandson Visits Site Where Grandfather Died in Blast
- Each Party Seeking to Modify or Reverse an Administrative Agency Ruling Must File Separate Appeal With Reviewing Court
- Penalty for Out-of-State Sex Offender’s Failure to Register in Ohio Based on ‘Substantially Equivalent’ Ohio Offense
- Chief Justice O’Connor Speaks at OSBA Convention
- Sentence That Omits Mandatory License Suspension Ruled Void, Resentencing Limited to Imposing Required Suspension
Tags
akron attorney akron ohio akron police akron police department anonymous tips bankruptcy bankruptcy car chase chief of police cleveland news concessions county deputies coventry township crime law deputies drive thru enforcement police finance co fraternal order of police fri fri dec fugitive furloughs gilbride gus hall home invasion human interest interest law latest local news law enforcement law enforcement organizations law lawyers mdash news briefs news feed ohio summit police associations police detectives police law police police summit county ohio summit county sheriff twinsburg ohio UTC war conflict wkyc tv
Similar Posts
- Supreme Court Holds That Trial Court Lacked Authority to Modify Defendant’s Final Criminal Sentence
- Administrative Appeal is ‘Filed’ When Clerk of Courts Serves Appeal Notice on Agency Within Time Limit
- Ten Dollar Limit on Skill Game Prizes Does Not Violate Equal Protection Clauses of U.S., Ohio Constitutions
- Court Rules Limited Warranty Does Not Waive Home Builder’s Legal Duty of ‘Workmanlike Construction Using Ordinary Care’
- Court Upholds Law Mandating Bifurcated Trials When Tort Claims Seek Both Compensatory and Punitive Damages